¶1Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered April 13, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
¶2Judgment affirmed.
¶3The complainant’s testimony was properly received into evidence (see People v Morales, 37 NY2d 262; People v Alex, 260 NY 425). Although a police officer’s testimony constituted improper bolstering of the complainant’s statements, there is no significant probability that the jury would have acquitted defendant in the absence of this testimony (see People v Johnson, 57 NY2d 969).
¶4We also note that although the use of the phrase “if your minds are waivering [szc] or the scales are even” in charging the jury as to reasonable doubt is strongly disapproved, the charge, in its entirety, conveyed the appropriate standard of proof (see People v Webb, 97 AD2d 779; People v Thompson, 97 AD2d 554). Therefore, reversal on this ground in the interest of justice is not required.
¶5We find that the sentence imposed was an appropriate exercise of the court’s discretion. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Lawrence, JJ., concur.