Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 ALA 100 - Holley v. State

Holley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
April 1968
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 1968

21 state decisions

7018941900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pate v. State · Lewis v. State · Owen v. State · Pellum v. State · Albritton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The charge requested by defendant was properly refused. It asserts the untenable proposition, that the defendant was not required to establish the defense of an alibi which he set up, to the reasonable satisfaction of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.