Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 Ariz. 131 - Schock v. Jacka

Schock v. Jacka’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2023

21 state decisions

1201969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thelberg · Moore v. Meyers · Elerick v. Rocklin · State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Nabours · Pauley v. Hadlock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Of course, it is correct that misrepresentation and concealment both may constitute actionable fraud, and in some cases may factually be but two sides of the same legal coin. Where failure to disclose a material fact is calculated to induce a false belief, the distinction between concealment and affirmative misrepresentation is tenuous. Both are fraudulent. However, mere failure to disclose a fact, although it may be fraudulent, is not equivalent to affirmation of the contrary fact. See Dash v. Jennings, 272 App.Div. 1073 , 74 N.Y.S.2d 881 (1947).” Schock v. Jacka, 105 Ariz. 131, 133 , 460 P.2d 185, 187 (1969).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.