Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 Cal. App. 17 - Wynne v. Wright

105 Cal. App. 17 - Wynne v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 1950
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 1950

22 state decisions

120193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co. · Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co. · Seller v. Market-Street Railway Co. · Johnson v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co. · Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘It is only where no fact is left in doubt, and no deduction or inference other than negligence can be drawn by the jury from the evidence, that the court can say, as a matter of law, that contributory negligence is established. Even where the facts are undisputed, if reasonable minds might draw different conclusions upon the question of negligence, the question is one of fact for the jury.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.