105 Cal. App. 2d 752 - McKenna v. Ping’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1979
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tannhauser v. Adams · McCaslin v. Hamblen · 95 Cal. App. 2d 398 - Bell v. Towns · 102 Cal. App. 290 - Cruse v. Superior Court · 87 Cal. App. 2d 24 - Elbert, Ltd. v. Nolan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It appears to be a general rule that a limitation statute, with respect to an action to quiet title, does not run against one in possession of land, and a person in possession of land cannot be required under penalty of forfeiture to bring an action against one claiming an adverse interest or title to such property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the original tax delinquent owner in undisturbed possession,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.