Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 Colo. 475 - Huling v. Feddersen

Huling v. Feddersen’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 1975
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1975

10 state decisions

601940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. Board of Regents of the University of Colorado · Denison v. Jerome · Virden v. Hubbard · Barth v. Richter · Fenn v. Knauss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * Any injury to the interests of heirs, beneficiaries or creditors of the decedent arising through a diminution of the assets of the estate, even though not aggrieving the administrator personally, in legal effect is a grievance affecting him in his fiduciary and representative capacity within the meaning of the appeal statute. This is clearly determined in the case of Denison v. Jerome, 43 Colo. 456 , 96 Pac. 166 , where we expressly upheld the right of an administrator to appeal to the district court from a judgment of the county court allowing a claim against the estate which he so represented, and our pronouncements therein conclude the question under consideration adversely to the contentions of plaintiff in error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The principal question for determination and the only one argued, is whether an administrator has the right of appeal to the district court from a judgment of the county court finally allowing a claim against the estate of the decedent which he represents. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.