Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 F.1d 356 - In re Ferris

In re Ferris’s Empirical Analysis

105 F. 356 · 1900

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
November 1929
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The testimony given by the bankrupt is in a very unsatisfactory condition, and it is impossible for the court to ascertain therefrom the exact position of the affairs of the bankrupt, or to find with any certainty that in truth when the proceedings in bankruptcy were filed the bankrupt retained any interest in the mortgaged property or its proceeds. The opposing creditor having failed, therefore, to sustain the specifications by sufficient evidence, the same must be overruled, and a discharge must be granted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““There is much in the testimony of the bankrupt that indirectly lends support to this position, yet it is not affirmatively proven that the debts due to the brother and sister were unfounded. - * * The opposing creditor having failed, iheroforo, to sustain the specification by sufficient evidence the same must be overruled.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.