Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 F.2d 334 - Mitchell v. Ottinger

Mitchell v. Ottinger’s Empirical Analysis

105 F.2d 334 · 1939

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
July 1948
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 66

Relies on California Bank v. Kennedy · Pufahl v. Parks' Estate · Forrest v. Jack · Ohio Valley National Bank v. John Hulitt · Seabury v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At common law, when there were several trustees, they were considered to hold the trust estate as joint tenants and on the death of any one trustee, the trust estate remained vested in the surviving trustee or trustees and the Pennsylvania rule is not otherwise.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.