Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 F.2d 784 - Koebel v. Coe

Koebel v. Coe’s Empirical Analysis

105 F.2d 784 · 1939

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
March 1959
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp. · Morgan v. Daniels · Radio Corporation of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories · Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co. · Bayer v. Rice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “25. A filament for electric incandescent lamps or other devices, composed substantially of tungsten and made up mainly of a number of comparatively large grains of such size and contour as to prevent substantial sagging and offsetting during a normal or commercially useful life for such a lamp or other device.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.