Farley v. Heininger’s Empirical Analysis
105 F.2d 79 · 1939
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2006 · most notably Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Heininger (1943), Baker v. United States (1940)
12 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc. · Durland v. United States · American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty · Bates & Guild Co. v. Payne · Houghton v. Payne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact that an opinion of an expert is in conflict with the opinions of others who are not experts does not deprive it of substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Application of LL“`something different from, superior to, and worth more than, what is actually being sold'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.