McCormick v. Stalder’s Empirical Analysis
105 F.3d 1059 · 1997
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably Geiger v. Jowers (2005), Mark Anthony Harris Michael Hegmann Janet Boyd Rose James (1999)
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Estelle v. Gamble · Farmer v. Brennan · Parratt v. Taylor · Neitzke v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Deliberate indifference encompasses only the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain repugnant to the conscience of mankind.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“alleges the violation of a legal interest which clearly does not exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carlucci v. Chapa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.