Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 F.3d 1195 - WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Gasconade County

WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Gasconade County’s Empirical Analysis

105 F.3d 1195 · 1997

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
5
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 6 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Handeen v. Lemaire (1997), Wisdom

9 federal appellate · 6 district · 6 state decisions

400199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. · Nixon v. Administrator of General Services · Lee v. Brown · V Subversive Activities Control Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When one makes an 'as applied' challenge, he or she is attacking only the decision that applied the ordinance to his or her property, not the ordinance in general.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “In considering a motion to dismiss, the court must construe the complaint liberally and assume all factual allegations to be true.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is arbitrary, capricious and not rationally related to a legitimate public purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.