Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

105 F.3d 1320

Docket No. 92-56094.

Spink v. Lockheed Corp.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-01-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1997

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINK · Spink v. Lockheed Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-01-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. CV-92-0800-SWV.

Before D.W. NELSON, REINHARDT, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 116 S.Ct. 1783, 60 F.3d 616

¶1

Plaintiff-Appellant's petition for rehearing, suggestion for rehearing en banc, and request for recall of mandate, received September 23, 1996, is ordered filed.

¶2

Plaintiff-Appellant's request for recall of mandate is GRANTED.

¶3

The defendants-appellees shall file a response to the plaintiff-appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc. Said response shall not exceed fourteen (14) pages and shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date this order is filed.

/105/f3d/1320 · .json · Public domain