Judd v. Rodman’s Empirical Analysis
105 F.3d 1339 · 1997
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Alexander v. Fulton County (2000), Goldsmith v. Bagby Elevator Co. (2008)
38 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Collins v. Wayne Corp. · Reyes v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · United States v. Guerrero · Rojas v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as a general proposition, an overruled motion in limine does not preserve a party's objection for purposes of appeal.... [H]owever, a motion in limine may be adequate to preserve an error ... if a good reason exists not to object at trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]e overturn evidentiary rulings only when the moving party has proved a substantial prejudicial effect.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[E]vidence of prior sexual relationships . . . was highly relevant to Rodman's liability”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.