Thacker v. Menard, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
105 F.3d 382 · 1997
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2019
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · 153 Ill. 2d 534 - Siegel v. Levy Organization Development Co. · Geier v. Medtronic, Inc. · 236 Ill. App. 3d 891 - Totz v. Continental Du Page Acura · 229 Ill. App. 3d 1032 - Duran v. Leslie Oldsmobile, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“eliminated the common law fraud requirement of scienter, and it is not necessary to prove actual reliance on the deception.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.