Scott L. SILVER, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. H&R BLOCK, INC.; Thomas M. Block; Ozzie Wenich, Appellees’s Empirical Analysis
105 F.3d 394 · 1997
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 14 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Ganino v. Citizens Utilities Co. (2000), K-Tel International Inc Securities Litigation v. Rg N
15 federal appellate · 14 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Meyer Pincus Associates Pc v. Oppenheimer & Co Inc · Alpern v. UtiliCorp United, Inc. · Fecht v. Price Co. · Rosenbaum v. Syntex Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reject conclusory allegations of law and unwarranted inferences.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The issue is appropriately decided as a matter of law, however, when reasonable minds could not differ. In other words, if no reasonable investor could conclude public statements, taken together and in context, were misleading, then the issue is appropriately resolved as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re: K-Tel International, Inc. Securities Litigation Pasquale Migliaccio Creative Care Corporation Glen Reudolph Morton Kahn David Rea Henry Werres Claude Seymour Igal Mammon Neil Litton, Dr. Jerry Booth Joseph Erlich Gary Ewin Tim Murchison Stanford D. Williams Rev. R.G. Moore Murray N. Johnson Elizabeth Alpert Arthur Alves Societe Financiere Privee and Ravi Anand, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. K-Tel International, Inc. Philip Kives Lawrence Kives, Securities and Exchange Commission, Amicus on Behalf Of · K-Tel International Inc Securities Litigation v. Rg N“We need not reach the [Rule 56(f)] discovery issue because the district court could have granted [defendant's] motion to dismiss rather than convert the motion to one for summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Casazza v. Kiser
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.