United States v. Fuentes’s Empirical Analysis
105 F.3d 487 · 1997
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably State v. Bishop (2009), United States v. $109,179 in United States Currency (2000)
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Beck v. State of Ohio · United States v. Sokolow · Rogers v. First National Bank of Peoria · United States v. Fouche
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“People do not have to voluntarily give up their privacy or freedom of movement, on pain of justifying forcible deprivation of those same liberties if they refuse.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.