United States v. Carrozzella’s Empirical Analysis
105 F.3d 796 · 1997
Citation profile
73 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably United States v. Zagari (1997), United States v. Dauray (2000)
73 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · City of Burlington v. Dague · Invex Holdings, N.V. v. Equitable Life Insurance · Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee Police Department
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) the number of knowing participants; (ii) the number of unknowing participants whose activities were organized or led by the defendant with specific criminal intent; (iii)the extent to which the services of the unknowing participants were peculiar and necessary to the criminal scheme.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the offense involved . . . violation of any judicial or administrative order, injunction, decree, or process not addressed elsewhere in the guidelines.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n assessing whether an- organization is ‘otherwise extensive,’ all persons involved during the course of the entire offense' are to be considered.” U.S.S.G. § 3131.1(a) cmt. n. 3 (emphasis added). ' - 9 . The Government argues that”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.