Pearson v. James’s Empirical Analysis
105 F.3d 828 · 1997
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2019
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Waller v. Georgia · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California for County of Riverside · Gannett Co Inc v. A · United States v. Indelicato · United States v. Ianniello
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Disguising the witness risks lessening the jury’s opportunity to observe the witness’s demeanor and assess credibility .... ”), with id. at 77 (Parker, J., dissenting) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Morales v. Artuz“disguise might impair the jury's ability to assess the credibility of the [witness]”), with Okonkwo v. Lacy, 104 F.3d 21 , 26 (2d Cir.1997) (identifying”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morales v. Artuz“adequately supported an overriding interest in protecting the undercover officer from exposure of her identity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ayala v. Speckard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.