Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

105 F. App'x 518

Brown v. Levenstein

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 18, 2004

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-08-18

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · United States v. Robinson

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion · Decided 2004-08-18

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

¶2 Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the ap *519 peal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

¶3 The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 27, 1996. The notice of appeal was filed on March 8, 2004. Because Brown failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4 DISMISSED

/105/fappx/518 · .json · Public domain