Slayton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1947
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Forrest Lake v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 3 of the same Act, section 4450 C.G.L. provides as follows: `This law shall not in any manner affect the provisions of any existing law relative to qualifications of jurors or to the selection of jury lists, but the same shall be held to provide for the making up of jury lists under orders of the circuit judge from time to time as said circuit judge may be advised is necessary to avoid the jury box becoming exhausted.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Custer v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.