Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 FRD 106 - Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2016

3 federal appellate · 6 district ·

901985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 1251

Relies on Donaldson v. United States · Trbovich v. United Mine Workers · Kirchberg v. Feenstra · Cascade Natural Gas Corporation v. El Paso Natural Gas Co People of State of California · Nuesse v. Camp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thus, the Teague Intervenors stand to gain or lose by the direct legal operation of the district court’s judgment on ERC's complaint. After seeking a declaratory judgment that it is not liable under the Multimedia Policy with regard to the class action, ERC cannot now be heard to claim that the Teague Intervenors (the class action plaintiffs) lack a sufficient interest to oppose such declaratory judgment. Accordingly, we find that the Teague Intervenors' interest in the subject matter of this litigation is a “significantly protectable interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[s]ome courts have concluded that an interve-nor must demonstrate more than "a mere provable claim” in order to be entitled to intervention of right, see Independent Petrochemical”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.