105 F. Supp. 2d 3 - Crystalline H2O, Inc. v. Orminski’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Rule 56(f) provides that [sjhould it appear from the affidavits of a party opposing the motion [for summary judgment] that the party cannot for reasons stated present by affidavit facts essential to justify the party’s opposition, the court may refuse the application for judgment or may order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or depositions to be taken or discovery to be had or may make such order as is just.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 261 F. Supp. 2d 113 - Gill v. Hoadley

2. “[tjhere is a critical distinction ... between cases where a litigant opposing a motion for summary judgment requests a stay of that motion to conduct additional discovery and cases where that same litigant opposes a motion for summary judgment on the ground that it is entitled to an opportunity to commence discovery.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 383 F. Supp. 2d 413 - Seneca Beverage Corp. v. HealthNow New York, Inc.