Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 Idaho 2 - Budell v. Todd

Budell v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2020

9 state decisions

4019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “controlling question of law as to which there is substantial grounds for difference of opinion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'to provide an immediate appeal from an interlocutory order if substantial legal issues of great public interest or legal questions of first impression are involved.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.