105 Ill. App. 3d 350 - McNeil v. Diffenbaugh’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Duprey v. Shane · 81 Ill. 2d 229 - Collier v. Wagner Castings Co. · 77 Ill. 2d 313 - Smith v. Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago · 56 Ill. App. 3d 997 - Madden v. Kuehn · 85 Ill. 2d 352 - McCormick v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is the status of the person injured at the time of the injury, not the nature or source of the injury, that determines the exclusive application of the Act. (Ferguson v. Roundtable Motor Lodge (1980), 83 Ill. App. 3d 331 , 404 N.E.2d 1039 .) *** ‘In the course of employment’ relates to the time, place and circumstances of the injury, while ‘arising out of the employment’ refers to the requisite causal connection between the injury and the employment. (Martin v. Kralis Poultry Co. (1973), 12 Ill. App. 3d 453 , 297 N.E.2d 610 .) Thus, the exclusiveness of the Act precludes a common law action for damages by an employee against a co-employee based on the latter’s negligence during the course of their employment.” 105 Ill. App. 3d 350, 352 , 434 N.E.2d 377, 380 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.