Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 KAN 127 - Cox v. Chalfant

Cox v. Chalfant’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 1967
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1967

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

30191919201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Gilpin · Greenawalt v. Este · Singleton v. Hill · Helling v. Darby · Sullivant v. Jahren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The terms of the contract, at least as to the abstract, the place of payment, and the mutual agency of the Elk City Bank, were not embraced in the letter.” (p. 128.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.