Bice v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 1997
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrow v. Bonebrake · Balch v. Beach · Westerman v. Corder · Akins v. Holmes · Griesa v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In this state, false statements of fact, made by a seller to induce a sale and relied on by the buyer, are actionable, without regard to whether or not the seller knew the statements to be false, or acted recklessly in making them, or intended to deceive. (Wickham v. Grant, 28 Kan. 517 ; Morrow v. Bonebrake, 84 Kan. 724 , 115 Pac. 585 ; Westerman v. Corder, 86 Kan. 239 , 119 Pac. 868 ; Maffet v. Schaar, 89 Kan. 403 , 131 Pac. 589 ; Akins v. Holmes, 89 Kan. 812, 820 , 133 Pac. 849 .)””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.