Vandling v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1935
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Neither Vandling nor Griffith was a party to the other suit, and of course neither one was benefited or harmed by the judgment.” (p. 481.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McFall v. Ford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.