State v. Kagi’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1973
1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. White · State v. Bohan · State v. Tawney · State v. Johnson · State v. Mumford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The fact that the judge may believe the accused guilty of the crime charged is not sufficient to show prejudice, for two reasons; he is not the trier of the facts; and his legal training and experience enable him to pass upon the admissibility of evidence and to- give the proper instructions regardless of his own belief as to the guilt or innocence of the accused.” (p. 537.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“• . In this case, it is for the jury to say from the testimony, First, whether the personal property described in the information was stolen, and if it was stolen, was it found in the possession of the defendant recently thereafter, and if it was so found, is it now explained or unexplained by the defendant.’ ” (p. 539.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Aten
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.