Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 MDAPP 636 - Prande v. Bell

Prande v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2014

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

90199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Soberon v. United States · Latimer v. Stainer · Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United Distribution Cos. · Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United Distribution Cos. · Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. Seney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen a client sues a lawyer for malpractice resulting from the settlement of an earlier claim and the issue of the attorney's negligence was not decided in the earlier adjudication, the party claiming the malpractice has not been given a fair opportunity to be heard on the issue of the attorney's negligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t would be patently unfair to allow attorneys who may have committed malpractice in handling a case to turn around and rely on a defense that effectively says that, because the client knowingly settled his or her case, the issue of whether the attorney was negligent was also settled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the attorney's recommendation in regard to settlement was one that no reasonable attorney, having undertaken a reasonable investigation into the facts and law as would be appropriate under the circumstances, and with knowledge of the same facts, would have made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.