State v. Aus’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2012
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stroud v. United States · Clarence Murphy v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · State v. Thompson · State v. Keerl · State v. Mjelde
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘It is an established principle of law that a defendant in a criminal ease who procures a verdict and judgment against him to be set aside by the court may be tried anew upon the same or another indictment for the same offense of which he was convicted.’ ” (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sanders““For most purposes, the grant of a new trial places the parties in the same position as though the case had not previously been heard; however, neither a new imdictment nor a new plea is necessary.” (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sanders
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.