105 N.C. App. 218 - Cobb v. Reitter’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited
32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Smith · Feibus & Co., Inc. v. Godley Const. Co., Inc. · Daughtry v. Turnage · 98 N.C. App. 187 - McFetters v. McFetters · 103 N.C. App. 31 - Hines v. Arnold
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our standard of review on the grant of a motion for directed verdict is “whether, upon examination of all the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party [with this] party be[ing] given the benefit of every reasonable inference drawn therefrom, the evidence is sufficient to be submitted to the jury.” A directed verdict should be granted in favor of the moving party only where “ ‘the evidence so clearly establishes that fact in issue that no reasonable inferences to the contrary can be drawn,’ and ‘if the credibility of the movant’s evidence is manifest as a matter of law.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“all inconsistencies, contradictions and conflicts for [the plaintiff], giving [the plaintiff] the benefit of all reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.