Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 N.C. App. 390 - State v. Johnson

105 N.C. App. 390 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2017

14 state decisions

80199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kennedy · State v. Hamilton · 78 N.C. App. 167 - State v. Catoe · State v. Hamilton · State v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]unnilingus, fellatio, analingus, or anal intercourse, but does not include vaginal intercourse. Sexual act also means the penetration, however slight, by any object into the genital or anal opening of another person’s body; provided, that it shall be an affirmative defense that the penetration was for accepted medical purposes.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person is guilty of a sexual offense in the first degree if the person engages in a sexual act: (1) With a victim who is a child under the age of 13.years and the defendant is at least 12 years old and is at least four years older than the victim ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “describe[es] a sexual act involving 'contact between the mouth of one party and the sex organs of another,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.