Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

105 N.C. App. 52

411 S.E.2d 640

Cox v. Hozelock, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 1992

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1992-01-07

Relies on World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-01-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2010

10 state decisions

60199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Judge Wells

¶1concurring.

¶2I concur with the result reached by the majority with this additional comment. The “stream of commerce” standard set out in World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980) establishes a two-step analysis: (1) whether a foreign defendant has placed or delivered its product into the stream of commerce, and (2) with the expectation that the product will be purchased by consumers in the forum state. The acts of the defendant in this case meet both requirements of this standard.

/105/ncapp/52 · .json · Public domain