Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 NEB 452 - Centoamore v. State

Centoamore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
July 1964
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1964

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

5019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vogel v. Gruaz · Worthington v. Scribner · Michael v. Matson · Oliver v. Pate · People v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Criminal proceedings are instituted with the object, not alone of securing convictions, but of getting as near to the truth as possible on the question of the guilt or innocence of the accused. . . .” (p. 455.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.