State v. Crounse’s Empirical Analysis
1921
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 1962
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Oswald v. St. Paul Globe Publishing Co. · Cowling v. Zenith Iron Co. · Ward v. City of Norton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The work which characterizes the business of publishing a newspaper is the gathering and disseminating of news, the furnishing to subscribers of various kinds of information, the carrying of advertisements, and the writing of editorials and articles on matters of public interest. Machinery and mechanical labor are indispensable, but are only incidental to the carrying on of the main purpose of the business. A newspaper is the product of intellectual effort, not of mechanical labor. That such business is not manufacturing is supported by the following decisions: Oswald v. St. Paul Globe Publishing Co., 60 Minn. 82 , 61 N. W. 902 ; In re Capital Publishing Co., 10 MacArthur (D. C.) 405; Evening Journal Ass’n v. State Board of Assessors, 47 N. J. Law, 36, 54 Am. Rep. 114 ; Press Printing Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 51 N. J. Law, 75, 16 Atl. 173 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.