Orfield v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2001
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McDougall v. North Carolina · Austin v. State · Ybarra v. State · Boggs v. State · Robertson v. Sheriff, Clark County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] conviction shall not be had on the testimony of an accomplice unless he is corroborated by other evidence which in itself, and without the aid of the testimony of the accomplice, tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense; and the corroboration shall not be sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense or the circumstances thereof.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An accomplice is one who is liable to prosecution for the identical offense charged against the defendant, NRS 175.291(2), or who is culpably implicated in, or unlawfully cooperates, aids or abets in the commission of the crime charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Greene v. State“Moreover, it is hornbook law `that conduct, to be criminal, must consist of something more than mere action (or non-action where there is a legal duty to act); some sort of bad state of mind is required as well.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Greene v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.