Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 Nev. 192 - Sutherland v. Gross

Sutherland v. Gross’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 19 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Consolidated Generator-Nevada, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co. (1998), Dow Chemical Co. v. Mahlum (1998)

3 federal appellate · 19 district · 16 state decisions

2001989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Collins v. Union Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n · Ramona Manor Convalescent Hospital v. Care Enterprises · Leavitt v. Leisure Sports Incorporation · 195 Cal. App. 2d 621 - Kooper v. King · Sherman Gardens Company v. Longley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a valid and existing contract; (2) the defendant's knowledge of the contract; (3) intentional acts intended or designed to disrupt the contractual relationship; (4) actual disruption of the contract; and (5) resulting damage.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Likewise, when the defenses interposed by the answering co-defendant call into question the validity of plaintiffs entire cause of action and when such defenses prove successful, the defenses inure to the benefit of the defaulting co-defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the answer of a co-defendant inures to the benefit of a defaulting defendant when there exists a common defense as to both of them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.