Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 Nev. 7 - State v. Hall

State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2026

19 state decisions

12019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · 119 Wis. 2d 461 - State v. Disch · Boggs v. State · City of Las Vegas v. O'DONNELL

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nevada has enacted statutory regulations to protect a defendant from the admission of inaccurate test results. Specifically; a defendant is entitled to receive “full information” regarding the machine used to test his blood samples and is entitled to inspect the machine. ... If a defendant can establish that the machine was improperly maintained, he can move to have the test results suppressed for that reason.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n order to establish a due process violation resulting from the state's loss or destruction of evidence, a defendant must demonstrate either (1) that the state lost or destroyed the evidence in bad faith, or (2) that the loss unduly prejudiced the defendant's case and the evidence possessed an exculpatory value that was apparent before the evidence was destroyed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.