105 N.J. Super. 33 - State v. Kuznitz’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2018
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3109
Relies on Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Ker v. State of California · Berger v. New York · Miller v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a loud male voice apparently taking telephone calls, receiving bets on sporting events, and giving out the odds on baseball games.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“clearly no justification for that conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.