Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 N.M. 10 - State v. Clark

State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
3
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably State v. Duffy (1998), State v. Pennington (1993)

36 state decisions

1401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · United States v. Matlock · United States v. Martinez-Fuerte · Smith v. Maryland · Chapman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ordinarily afforded the most stringent [F]ourth [A]mendment protection.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “As to the assertion that the [investigatory] report was not material to the defense, the state offers no authority for the proposition that information that would certainly impact a defense counsel’s tactical trial decisions is not material to the defense. Receipt of the report would clearly affect counsel’s decisions on further suppression motions; on whether defendant should testify; on the preparation of defendant for cross-examination; and on the extent of information elicited by defense counsel on direct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Notwithstanding that the facts surrounding the altered license would be inadmissible as an underlying circumstance of a prior conviction, those same facts are admissible under [Rule 11-608(B) ], as a specific instance of conduct which is probative of truthfulness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.