Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 N.M. 167 - Candelaria v. General Electric Co.

Candelaria v. General Electric Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
4
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2006 · most notably Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of Enfield (1993), Breen v. Carlsbad Municipal Schools (2005)

44 state decisions

320198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bailey v. American General Insurance Company · Fryar v. Johnsen · Garcia v. Genuine Parts Co. · Burlington Mills Corp. v. Hagood · Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f both physical trauma leading to psychological disability, and emotional stress, leading to physical disability are compensable, it [also] follows that emotional stress leading to psychological disability comes within the Act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Claims for workmen’s compensation shall be allowed only: (1) when the workman has sustained an accidental injury arising out of, and in the course of, his employment; (2) when the accident was reasonably incident to his employment; and (3) when the disability is a natural and direct result of the accident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “psychological injury resulting from a sudden or gradual emotional stimulus `arises out of' employment when it is causally related to the performance of job duties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.