Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 N.M. 27 - State v. Copeland

State v. Copeland’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

2 district · 101 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably State v. Gomez (1997), State v. Duffy (1998)

2 district · 101 state decisions

5801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Stoner v. California · Segura v. United States · State v. Donaldson · State v. Boeglin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`an emergency situation requiring swift action to prevent imminent danger to life or serious damage to property, or to forestall the imminent escape of a suspect or destruction of evidence.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Probable cause' exists when facts and circumstances within the officer's knowledge or on which the officer has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has been, or is being, committed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “whether, on the basis of the facts known to a prudent, cautious, trained officer, the officer could reasonably conclude that swift action was necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.