Duran v. Xerox Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Reynolds v. Ruidoso Racing Association, Inc. · Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp. · Wylie Corp. v. Mowrer · Varos v. Union Oil Co. of California · Knippel v. Northern Communications, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We understand this section to mean at least that procedures involved in claiming benefits under the [Subsequent Injury Act] shall be followed as they are in workmen’s compensation claims; however, this does not mean that every provision that applies to a claim against an employer for workmen’s compensation is also applicable to subsequent injury claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.