Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 N.M. 701 - Thompson Drilling, Inc. v. Romig

Thompson Drilling, Inc. v. Romig’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2018 · most notably Felder v. Casey (1988), Diversey Corp. v. Chem-Source Corp. (1998)

54 state decisions

2201987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 41 Colo. App. 1 - Sego v. Mains · Adams v. UNITED STEELWORKERS, ETC. · Gonzales v. Sansoy · Sanchez v. Martinez · State Ex Rel. Conley Lott Nichols MacHinery Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he right to object to an improper verdict is waived when not made at the time of the return of the verdict and cannot be reclaimed and revived by resorting to a motion for a new trial or on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the time and labor required — the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved and skill required; (2) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar services; (3) the amount involved and the results obtained; (4) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances; and (5) the experience, reputation and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the services.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.