105 Ohio App. 3d 226 - State v. Soke’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 129 Ohio App. 3d 294 - State v. Hirsch (1998), State v. Garcia (1997)
61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Bagley · Kyles v. Whitley · State v. Bradley · State v. Dehass
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hether to admit a prior inconsistent statement which is collateral to the issue being tried and pertinent only with respect to the credibility of a witness is a matter within the trial court's discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“evidence of threats or intimidation of witnesses reflect a consciousness of guilt and is admissible as admission by conduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.