105 Ohio App. 3d 341 - Jackson v. Bellomy’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““When an attorney representing a litigant in a pending case requests permission or is called to testify in that case, the court shall first determine the admissibility of the attorney’s testimony without reference to DR 5-102(A). If the court finds that the testimony is admissible, then that attorney, opposing counsel, or the court sua sponte, may make a motion requesting the attorney to withdraw voluntarily or be disqualified by the court from further representation in the case. The court must then consider whether any of the exceptions to DR 5-102 are applicable and, thus, whether the attorney may testify and continue to provide representation. In making these determinations, the court is not deciding whether a Disciplinary Rule will be violated, but rather preventing a potential violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility.” See, also, 155 N. High, Ltd. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 423 , 650 N.E.2d 869 ; Jackson v. Bellomy (1995), 105 Ohio App.3d 341 , 663 N.E.2d 1328 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 141 Ohio App. 3d 377 - Environmental Network Corp. v. TNT Rubbish Disposal, Inc.