Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 105 Ohio App. 3d 693 - State v. Tumbleson

105 Ohio App. 3d 693 - State v. Tumbleson’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
2
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 135 Ohio App. 3d 262 - State v. Ross (1999), 159 Ohio App. 3d 189 - State v. Drayer (2004)

90 state decisions

4101995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jenks · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · State v. Lott · Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · Porzig v. Nolden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “permeates the entire atmosphere of the trial.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Prosecutorial misconduct rises to the level of plain error if it is clear the defendant would not have been convicted in the absence of the improper comments.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] charge of complicity may be stated in terms of this section, or in terms of the principal offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.