State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2024
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Master v. City of Cleveland · Kala v. Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co. · 3 Ohio App. 3d 125 - Berger v. Berger · 152 Ohio App. 3d 629 - State v. Condon · In re Disqualification of Kate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[C]ourts of common pleas possess inherent power to appoint special prosecutors in criminal matters.” (quoting State ex rel. Master v. Cleveland, 75 Ohio St.3d 23 , 661 N.E.2d 180, 184 (1996))); State ex rel. Friedrich v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 192 Wis.2d 1 , 531 N.W.2d 32, 38 (1995) (explaining that,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A hearing is indeed required when an attorney for a party to a case does not want to be disqualified or when an attorney's law firm wishes to continue representation despite that attorney's conflict of interest”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.