State v. Danison’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably State v. Miller (2010), State v. Lalain (2013)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Columbus v. Taylor · State v. Crago · State v. Bassham · State v. Hunt · 153 Ohio App. 3d 477 - State v. Ramirez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] sentence is the sanction or combination of sanctions imposed by the sentencing court on an offender who pleads guilty to or is convicted of an offense. * * * The sentence imposed on an offender for a felony may include financial sanctions, including restitution in an amount based on the victim's economic loss.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Downey · State v. Getz“[A]n order of restitution imposed by the sentencing court on an offender for a felony is part of the sentence and, as such, is a final and appealable order.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“the imposition of a restitution order is not a final appealable order until a hearing is held to enforce payment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.